Possession As Protection: Masculinity, Intimacy, and the Rituals We Forgot

This is the second essay in the SXII Secure Prelude series Love Prism: “Ego Death in Black Love” —a reflective, ritual-based exploration of relationship styles, erotic sovereignty, and the myths we inherit in Black love.

What happens when the promise of safety mutates into surveillance?

Monogamy, in its toxic form, becomes a tool of surveillance.

Abusive patriarchy, racism, and survival culture create false binaries: main vs side. Savior vs sinner. Sneaky link vs spouse. Weak vs strong. Possession As Protection dives into complexity, emotional control, and how the desire to feel “safe” can sometimes manifest as oppression.

Some chase you not to cherish you—but to contain you.
They are drawn to the rush of your glow, the movement of your spirit, the shine they believe they can't generate on their own.
But when they catch up, they ask questions they already know the answers to—just to see if you’ll stutter, stall, or stop shining.

This kind of siphoning is the shadow side of the serpent—one of the darker pledges masculinity makes when it forgets its duty to protect the feminine principle in humanistic, ecological truth.

Masculinity, as a frequency—and a social construct—is what I’m speaking to.

To avoid becoming a force of consumption, masculinity must be rooted in lyrical awareness, erotic ecology, and energetic truth. It must become a framework that honors, uplifts, and protects the feminine—rather than consuming it.

But what does protective masculinity actually look like? Not to be conflated with perfection. A mindful practice. Effort.

• The masculine that can be both direct and deeply caring.
• The masculine that knows how to deescalate—verbally, emotionally, spiritually—and when to activate physical protection with intention.
• The masculine that understands intimacy without obsession, and touch without trespass.

This essay is a map back to integrity—for those who are serious about cultivating futuristic frameworks that challenge the spirit, not just the sex. Because these dynamics don’t belong to one gender—they’re patterns. Spiritual patterns. And they’ve long been weaponized under the war strategy of white cis-heteropatriarchy.

In Black intimacy, the longing for safety has been confused with ownership. And this confusion, inherited and inflamed, becomes control disguised as care.

From an ancestral lens, the diaspora hasn’t been this cautious of one another. I say this because our mistrust, born from colonized survival, bleeds and is maintained into our economic systems. We don’t build as much as we monitor, assess, and protect ourselves from each other. That’s not a sustainable future. Culture and relationship are the cornerstones of any healthy economy. Intimacy is not separate from that.

This is why it's crucial to know the difference between being claimed and being sovereignly appreciated. One thrives on access. The other honors expansion. That's when mature, power exchange can be interpersonally sacred. That’s why I teach through BDSM—it helps us confront and rehearse the extremes of power with care, intention, and consent. No framework or subculture is without mistakes, error, or hard lessons. Because sometimes, we crave things we’re not spiritually ready to sustain.

You want control? You want submission?

Then you need the rituals. The contracts. The aftercare.

Because possession isn’t inherently bad. But without ritual, without consent, without negotiation as care—it’s not devotion. It’s domination. The kind our DNA is still recovering from.

We’ve inherited a demonic contract: the lie of superiority. And that’s the root of intracommunal betrayal.

This is where erotic ecology comes in.

Erotic ecology reminds us that our sensuality is not just personal—it’s planetary. How we touch, desire, relate, and create—ripples across ecosystems. It teaches that to honor erotic power is to restore relational balance.

And it requires remembering that our ancestors had systems.
Rituals of courtship. Codes of power. Communal guardians of pleasure. Masculinity as strategic oracles.

Our erotic memory holds the blueprints—but we’ve been interrupted.

Toxic Tech has only amplified the rupture.
It distorts intimacy into Proximity Delusion—the false sense of closeness created through digital access. It looks like ghost viewing. Breadcrumbing. Phantom scrolling. I’ve been there—captivated by someone’s language, charmed by their curation. Overindulging in a projection.

But digital compatibility doesn’t guarantee real-life alignment. Parasocial dynamics create one-sided intimacy, and sometimes even escalate into digital obsession—unethical surveillance, hacking, doxxing, humiliation rituals. These behaviors become new-age abuse tactics, masked as interest or affection.

Intimacy must be earned—not assumed.

Presence is not a public utility.
Softness is not a team-building exercise.
Blackness across sex, class, and expression is not for your inclusivity optics.

◇ Ask yourself ◇ When I reach for power, do I also reach for care? When I crave possession, do I have the tools to honor the soul I'm holding?

Before you name someone your “person,” ask: How does freedom fit in the space between us?

♡ Did this mirror something in you?
Join SXII Secure Livechat on Element, where we gather to refract, reflect, and rise in relational truth.

▪︎ Erotic Ecology: The sensual intelligence embedded in natural and social systems—recognizing that touch, attraction, and erotic resonance are part of an interconnected living world. Erotic ecology explores how intimacy flows through bodies, land, culture, and time.

▪︎ Ancestral Sexual Memory: The inherited imprint of erotic experiences, teachings, and taboos passed through lineage—shaping our desires, boundaries, and body wisdom, even if we can’t recall them cognitively. It affirms that eroticism is not just personal, but also collective and historical.

▪︎ Asexuality as Memory: A framework that recognizes asexuality not simply as a static identity, but also as a possible ancestral imprint or survival code. It honors the ways disconnection from erotic energy or explicit sexual acts can be a response to trauma, suppression, or spiritual calling—not a deficit, but a signal from deeper time.

▪︎ Lyrical Awareness: A practice of attuning to truth not just through logic or intellect, but through poetic, rhythmic, or intuitive resonance. It honors the musicality of meaning and the sensuality of storytelling as valid epistemologies.

▪︎ Energetic Truth: A form of knowing that arises from the felt sense—an embodied recognition that transcends surface narratives. It prioritizes coherence over performance and alignment over approval.

▪︎ Consent-Based Possession: A reframing of dominance and submission rooted in agreement, ritual, and clarity. It asks: what does it mean to be claimed without being controlled? This is possession in service of care, not consumption.

What does it mean to ethically consent to being controlled? It means entering a dynamic where practices like safewords, consensual non-consent, being risk aware, and explicit agreements are honored. Where surrender is chosen, not coerced—and where power is exchanged in sacred, sovereign rhythm.

▪︎ Erotic Sovereignty: The ability to sense, name, and choose your erotic energy without fear, shame, or coercion. It’s not about hypersexuality, but about self actualization as sacred agency.

▪︎ Intersectional Communion: A vision of community that sees layered identity not as threat, but as a bridge. It’s the opposite of respectability politics—an honoring of difference as design.